Meals, restaurants, recipes, food news, and food stories that keep us ruminating. All of us think about food way too much. These ruminations will be anything from what we cooked last night to implications of new policy set by the USDA.
Photo by: MSR
1). to chew again 2). to engage in contemplation
In honor of Fat Tuesday, I will be eating 'sausage', mashed potatoes, and sauerkraut for dinner this evening. Goodness I love that combination. For the 'sausage', I'll be using the recipe below from Julie Hason. If you haven't tried it, do. It is fantastic. Anyone else have some 'Fat Tuesday' traditions or favorites?
Having grown up in Michigan around a large Polish-American community, I have become accustomed to eating pączki around this time year. Now that I am in New York, I am still able to find the decadent dough balls in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, a neighborhood with a large Polish population.
Though I was successful in finding them this year, I missed the day last year. Why? Because in the Polish-American community in Michigan, Pączki Day is Fat Tuesday (Mardi Gras). I was prepared this year after having read the great article about pączki on Wikipedia.
Hope you can find them where you live!
Recently Mark Bittman left his familiar job as the author of the NY Times' Minimalist column and host of the delightful, short cooking videos to write a column for the Time's opinion page on food issues. For some reason this fact still hasn't sunk in yet for me, and each week I'm happily surprised to see his name on the right side of the Times opinion column.
This week Bittman tackles the subject of Agricultural Food Subsidies. His article provides a great overview of the agricultural food subsidies program in the US (how it got started and who it currently benefits) and makes an excellent case for shifting these subsidies to small and medium-sized farmers, and using the money to encourage sustainable agriculture and subsidize fruits and vegetables.
"Eliminating the $5 billion in direct agricultural payments would level the playing field for farmers who grow non-subsidized crops, but just a bit — perhaps not even noticeably. There would probably be a decrease in the amount of HFCS in the market, in the 10 billion animals we “process” annually, in the ethanol used to fill gas-guzzlers and in the soy from which we chemically extract oil for frying potatoes and chicken. Those are all benefits, which we could compound by taking those billions and using them for things like high-speed rail, fulfilling our promises to public workers, maintaining Pell grants for low-income college students or any other number of worthy, forward-thinking causes...
By making the program more sensible the money could benefit us all. For example, it could:
• Fund research and innovation in sustainable agriculture, so that in the long run we can get the system on track.
• Provide necessary incentives to attract the 100,000 new farmers Secretary of Agriculture Vilsack claims we need.
• Save more farmland from development.
• Provide support for farmers who grow currently unsubsidized fruits, vegetables and beans, while providing incentives for monoculture commodity farmers to convert some of their operations to these more desirable foods.
• Level the playing field so that medium-sized farms — big enough to supply local supermarkets but small enough to care what and how they grow — can become more competitive with agribusiness."
I like these proposals. They sound good. And in the article Bittman notes how ending the current structure to agricultural subsidies has decent bipartisan report (although there are some notable Tea Party exceptions). Even Boehner and Glen Beck (GLEN BECK!) support cuts. That being said, time and time again, it seems, efforts to change the Farm Bill and the US agricultural subsidy regime have failed. Will 2012 be any different? What do people think?
Excellent news out of the heart land of American pig production. Both the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Duke University have selected Eating Animals, by Jonathan Safran Foer, for their summer reading book. For a while now, each university has selected one book they recommend all incoming students read. This year the two universities have joined together for the first time. Incoming students will be asked to read the book, and the book will be discussed in small groups during orientation.
Congratulations are in order to both schools, not just for choosing a splendid book, but also for having the courage to challenge their students to think about an issue that all too often people shy away from!